Issue 5: Funding Strategies for Digital Conversion
 
| Digitization facilitates new
ways of communicating information. The economics of
digitization and subsequent dissemination are, however,
different from those of conventional publication.
Accordingly, the Government of Canada must show
leadership by exploring innovative methods for digitizing
its holdings and encouraging new funding approaches and
strategies. This must become a priority, particularly in
light of decreasing resource levels. The bulk of
Canadas government information holdings, both
scientific and cultural, are not accessible in electronic
format because the cost of conversion is prohibitive,
particularly in the current fiscal environment. This is
especially true with the digitization of legacy
collections. With little or no additional allocations
from government or other sources specifically earmarked
for electronic conversion of significant retrospective
collections, little digitization of valuable older
materials will be accomplished.
Increasingly, government departments, agencies and
Crown corporations are adapting to the digital
environment. Through reallocation within existing
appropriations, digital access to government information
holdings has been achieved for a limited subset of
material, primarily material acquired or generated in the
last two to five years. In the Task Forces survey
of federal digitization activities, 75 percent of
federal institutions reported the primary source for
funding for digital products as the federal government.
Departments and agencies have thus achieved some success
in providing electronic access to current materials.
|
The
Canadian Museum of Civilization:
A Funding Case Study
Ongoing Digitization
- The Canadian Museum of
Civilization (CMCC) digitizes all new
acquisitions. It also creates digital
records for items from the collection
that are exhibited, travel to other
institutions, or are made available on
the Web site or for other outreach
initiatives.
Digitizing Retrospective
Collections through Partnerships
- Partnerships have been
beneficial in making some of CMCCs
retrospective collections available in
digital form. Since entering a strategic
alliance with Kodak Canada in 1994, CMCC
has digitized over 250,000 images at a
cost of $2 million. This represents
approximately 25 percent of the
collections CMCC would like to digitize.
Over this four-year period,
14 full-time equivalents were
created within the museum and Kodak hired
three full-time employees to work on site
at CMCC.
- Other private sector
partners have been attracted to the
Museum as a result of digitization
initiatives. The 3D Imaging project,
a joint collaboration between the
National Research Council and Hymark
Imaging, is one example. Other private
sector partners include Corel, which has
purchased over 600 images from the
digitized collection; Corbus, which has
licensed up to 5,000 images; and Academic
Press, which will provide Web access to
thousands of Museum images with royalties
flowing back to the Museum.
Future Digitization of
Retrospective Collections
- Due to an environment of
fiscal restraint, funding for the
digitization of the remaining
retrospective collections is difficult.
Although it continues to be a priority
for CMCC, without additional funds access
to these collections will be limited.
|
|
Where the federal government has begun to make some
information holdings available electronically to increase
efficiency, improve access and lower costs, Canadians have shown
remarkable expressions of interest. Examples of this can be seen
through the high use of many federal institutions Web
sites. Moreover, it can be demonstrated that electronic access to
government information has the potential to increase public
awareness of non-digital information held by government. This
awareness often leads to public demand for materials that are not
digitized; these demands create pressure to digitize more
materials. However, government agencies will need to continue to
publish information in paper formats for the foreseeable future.
Providing both conventional and electronic publications has
implications for resources, especially in the short term.
The 1995 IHAC report suggests that government may solicit
competitive bids from the private sector in its digitization
initiatives (Connection, Community, Content, p. 125).
However, the private sector will not invest without adequate
incentives. In fact, the survey results show that only
25 percent of respondents are involved in digitization
partnership agreements. Of the federal institutions involved in
partnership arrangements, 28 percent are partnering with the
private sector, 22 percent with not-for-profit
organizations, 11 percent with educational organizations,
and the remaining 39 percent with other types of
organizations, primarily government. Currently, neither the
regulatory environment nor the potential for revenue generation
or cost-recovery encourages such partnership.
Continuing changes in standards and network protocols,
technological innovations and new types of media and assets all
demand radical shifts in the way the federal government manages
information and provides access. These changes may be
accommodated through reallocation of resources within existing
appropriations, but in some cases additional funding may be
required to ensure that the federal government can respond to the
changes while continuing to meet public expectations and policy
objectives.
Given the range of funding challenges, new government
investment is required to support digitization. Decisions to make
digital copies available and to convert retrospective collections
should be based on a sound business-like methodology and
sufficient user demand. The private sector can be encouraged to
participate in this effort. Within a framework of five funding
strategies, the following recommendations are proposed:
- Strategy 1: Use Available Resources
- 5.1 Existing departmental
and agency allocations must continue to absorb the
costs of ongoing operations and practices in the
provision of access to already digitized material.
Digitization must be recognized as an essential
component of existing and planned programs. Funding
of existing and new programs should include specific
allocations for digitization.
| Example:
All new material that comes into the Canadian
Museum of Civilization is made available in
digital format. Scanned images are made part
of the public record and paid for through
appropriations. |
- Strategy 2: Exploit the Policy Framework
- 5.2 Treasury
Board should take responsibility to ensure that
guidelines are in place to facilitate collaborative
arrangements, to limit government costs and to
exploit private sector funding possibilities. In
addition, some flexibility should be allowed for
departments and agencies seeking to reinvest revenues
in digitization projects.
5.3 Repayable advances from Treasury Board for
specific digitization projects, which can be supported by a
business plan, may be available within the existing funding
processes.
| Example:
Geomatics Canada (NRCan) uses a Revolving
Fund to invest in the production of digital
maps. The fund requires careful management
but has allowed for flexibility in digitizing
a marketable product and in cost-recovery. |
- Strategy 3: Encourage Joint Action by
Departments, Agencies and Crown Corporations
- 5.4 Federal institutions should be encouraged to
collaborate with other public sector institutions, where
complementary mandates exist and where Treasury Board
infrastructure encourages flexibility in program delivery.
| Example: Under the
direction of Treasury Board, the Activity
Base Costing User Group is an
interdepartmental working group that has a
Web site to share and provide information
|
-
- 5.5 The government should
encourage jointly funded digitization projects
through federally initiated education and awareness
programs. These programs should target both public
and private sector organizations. This will lead to
the development of expertise as well as create
greater potential for innovative funding solutions
for digitization projects.
5.6 Federal departments, agencies and
Crown corporations should link their digitization
initiatives to other government objectives, such as
youth employment and the development of the Canadian
digitization and multimedia industry.
| Example:
Industry Canadas SchoolNet Digital
Collections program funds contracts covering
youth wages to digitize materials for display
on SchoolNet. |
- Strategy 4: Involve the Private Sector
- 5.7 Federal
institutions should develop flexible partnership
arrangements with the private sector for joint
investment and revenue sharing. Such a partnership
allows the government to take advantage of private
sector expertise and flexibility and also provides a
stream of revenue through the licensing of its
products to assist in more product creation.
5.8
The government should encourage joint
public-private digitization initiatives through
appropriate tax exemptions and licensing arrangements
for the private sector participants.
| Examples:
The Canadian Hydrographic Service (CHS),
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, has formed a
partnership with Nautical Data International
of St. Johns, Newfoundland. The company
markets and distributes CHSs digital
chart products to the world through its Web
site.
The National
Archives of Canada Act makes provision in
section 10 (1) for the National Archives
of Canada to receive donations and bequests
towards the support of its mandate through
the establishment of a National Archives
Account. |
- Strategy 5: Target New Government
Investment for Priority Digitization Projects
- 5.9 The federal government
should establish a central fund for digitizing legacy
collections, including digitization projects whose
primary justification is the provision of information
relating to the "public good".
A central fund accessible to both small and large
federal institutions can provide the means for digital
content development in Canada. Centralization of funding for
nation-wide digitization projects will unify government
priorities and directives and promote the selection and
accessibility of Canadian digital content.
| Examples:
IHAC (1997) recommended that $50 million
be invested over three years for the Canada
Health Information System, to provide
efficient and timely information about
treatments and health care. |
 
|