Library and Archives Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Institutional links

ARCHIVED - About Us

Archived Content

This archived Web page remains online for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. This page will not be altered or updated. Web pages that are archived on the Internet are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats of this page on the Contact Us page.

Audits and Evaluations

Monetary Appraisal of Acquisitions

Appendix B - Risk Ranking of Recommendations

The following table presents the recommendations and assigns risk rankings of high, moderate or low. Risk rankings were determined based on the relative priorities of the recommendations and the extent to which the recommendations indicate non-compliance with relevant federal legislation and LAC procedures.

Recommendations Priority Level
1. Management should reinforce the rigour associated with the governance related to the acquisition process to support management decisions. High
2. Management should reinforce the rigour associated with the application of the controls and define the expected documentation requirements that must be retained in each donation file to support key controls. In addition, management should establish a quality control process to ensure that all required documentation has been properly completed. High
3. Management should ensure that monitoring reports are regularly prepared and reviewed. These reports should provide sufficient information to ensure donations are aligned with LAC's mandate. Moderate

Previous | Table of Contents