Notes:
v. 33, no. 4, 1988, p. 486, 488, 490-492; v. 33,no. 5, 1988, p. 556, 558; v. 33, no. 6, 1988, p.725-727; v. 33, no. 7, 1988, p. 840, 842; v. 33,no. 8, 1988, p. 1004, 1006, 1008; v. 34, no. 1,1989, p. 74, 76, 78, 80-81; v. 34, no. 3, 1989, p.296, 298, 300, 302; v. 34, no. 4, 1989, p.454-457; v. 34, no. 5, 1989, p. 584-586; v. 34,no. 6, 1989, p. 770, 772; v. 34, no. 7, 1989, p.865-867; v. 34, no. 8, 1989, p. 988, 990, 992,994; v. 35, no. 1, 1990, p. 94-95; v. 35, no. 6,1990, p. 711-714; v. 35, no. 7, 1990, p. 832-834;v. 35, no. 8, 1990, p. 942-945; v. 37, no. 2,1992, p. 112-113. Partly reprinted in Map Stamp Study Group BNAPS newsletter, no. 18, 1988, p. 4-6. See also 'revised' version in BNA topics, v. 49, no. 3, 1992, p. 20-26; v. 49, no. 4, 1992, p. 14-16; v . 49, no. 5, 1992, p. 28-33; v. 49, no. 6, 1992, p. 36-42; v. 50, no. 1, 1993, p. 36-38; v. 50, no. 3, 1993, p. 34-41; v. 50, no. 4, 1993, p. 32-36; v. 50, no. 5, 1993, p. 56-63; + See also letter by Fred Fawn in v. 50, no. 1, 1993, p. 6-7; by Jack Davis in v. 50, no. 2, 1993, p. 15; by Cam Lindsay in v. 50, no. 2, 1993, p. 18.