
June 1996
PRELIMINARY STUDY
ON THE CORE COMPETENCIES OF THE
FUTURE RECORDS SPECIALIST
1.1 Objectives
1.2 Context
3.1 Record Keeping in an Electronic Work Environment
3.1.1 Development of a Record Keeping System
3.1.2 Guidelines
3.1.3 Management Support
3.2 Role of the Existing IM and IT Communities
3.3 Reaction to the Vision
3.4 The Future Records Specialist
3.5 Key Considerations
3.6 Education and Development
4.1 Job Model - Record Keeping Specialist
4.2 Education and Development Implications
APPENDIX A: Record Keeping Vision and Example
In the spring of 1995, National Archives initiated work on the development of a Guideline on The Management of Electronic Records in the Electronic Work Environment (EWE). The purpose of the guideline is to outline options that can help government institutions manage electronic records within an electronic work environment.
To ensure that the guideline met the needs of departments, and to encourage user "buy-in" so that the principles of the guideline would be adopted, National Archives conducted a consultation process. This process allowed representatives from across the federal government the opportunity to provide input based on their own experience with the management of electronic records. The revised guideline was issued in May 1996.
A major concern that emerged during the consultation process, was the issue of identifying "the right type of person" who would provide leadership and support as departments evolve toward the vision. To this end, Price Waterhouse was commissioned to develop a preliminary list of the core competencies (skills, knowledge, and abilities) that would be required by the future "records specialist" - the person responsible for ensuring that record keeping goes on in the organization.
The study began with a review of the vision documents for the electronic work environment and record keeping within the EWE, and a series of interviews with sponsors at the National Archives. Next, interviews were held with key informants across departments, including users and existing Information Management (IM) and Information Technology (IT) community members. These concentrated on the diversity of record keeping activities across departments, the current record keeping roles and responsibilities of the IM and IT communities, the role that the future records specialist would assume, and the related competencies that would be required.
Subsequently, a series of more in-depth focus groups were held with users, existing IM and IT community members and functional experts from corporate services (i.e., legal and financial services). These three disparate communities and their different perspectives were important for obtaining a comprehensive view of the challenges of record keeping in an electronic work environment, and the resulting competencies that will be needed by the future records specialist. In addition, the focus groups were structured to draw on ideas from individuals in positions of authority in the department as well as those in support roles.
The major findings of the interviews and focus groups were as follows:
The findings of the research were analyzed and aggregated into a preliminary job model for the record keeping specialist. The key job functions and corresponding skills, knowledge and abilities are detailed in Figure 1 on page iii.
Given this job model there are a number of initiatives which can be taken by training organizations across the federal government, as well as other public and private sector organizations to develop the set of core competencies required to meet the vision of record keeping in an electronic work environment. Table 1 presents a summary of organizations and the steps that can be taken to promote electronic record keeping expertise in the federal government.
Systems Designer
Policy Driver
Retrieval Expert
Advisor/Coach
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Record Keeping Specialists:
Organization |
Suggested Activity |
The Institute |
Expand curricula to include IM modules that incorporate courses in electronic record keeping; target existing IT and IM communities. |
CCMD |
Include an electronic record keeping component in all management level courses. |
TDC |
Expand curricula to include courses in electronic record keeping. |
Alliance of Libraries, Archives and Records Management (ALARM) |
Encourage associations to develop training in electronic record keeping (within an IM context) under the life-long learning action plan for ALARM. |
Universities |
Develop continuing education in the area of electronic record keeping that will permit individuals to develop the necessary expertise in this area. Include electronic record keeping courses or modules in specific disciplines such as: Computer Science, Management Science, Law, and Public Administration. |
Table 1: Education and Development Action Plan
Recommended Next Steps for the Development of Core Competencies
It is recommended that steps be taken to:
In the spring of 1995, National Archives initiated work on the development of a guideline on Managing Electronic Records in an Electronic Work Environment (EWE). The purpose of the guideline is to outline options that can help government institutions manage electronic records within an electronic work environment. The guideline includes the following documents:
To ensure that the guideline met the needs of departments and the users, and to encourage user "buy-in" so that the principles of the guideline would be adopted, National Archives conducted a consultation process on the guideline. This process allowed representatives from across the federal government the opportunity to provide input based on their own experience with the management of electronic records. The revised guideline was issued in May 1996.
An issue that emerged during the consultation process on the Vision of Record Keeping in the Electronic Work Environment, concerned who would be responsible for initiating, implementing and monitoring the progress toward the Vision. This study was commissioned to address this issue of identifying the "right type of person" to provide leadership and support to departments and users during the transition toward the vision. Its purpose is to develop a preliminary list of the core competencies (skills, knowledge and abilities) that will be required by the "future records specialist" in the electronic work environment. For the purposes of this study, the term "records specialist" refers to the person responsible for ensuring that record keeping goes on in an organization.
This study was conducted in cooperation with The Institute (PWGSC), Human Resources Development Branch - Treasury Board Secretariat, and the EWE Management Board and its Advisory Committee.
The overall objectives of the study were to:
Strong forces, including debt and deficit pressures, increased global competition and the promises of telecommunications and computing technology are driving change across the federal government. These forces have prompted the federal government to undertake a fundamental review of its programs and services. Departments are determining what activities are core to their mandates and which are not. The central thrust of this renewal agenda is to determine where the federal government should be positioned to deliver programs or services and to identify those programs and services that could be more appropriately delivered by others. The intended result of the review is to re-focus government resources on priority areas while reducing overall spending. A hypothesis that is emerging from this process of review is that the business of government will shift in focus, resulting in more emphasis on government's role in the areas of policy, safety and regulation. At the same time there will be a heightened requirement for government to be accountable for its actions. Society will expect government to be able to demonstrate that it can continue to hold itself accountable for the decisions that it makes and the direction that it sets through policy.
This fundamental restructuring of government programs and services is creating increasing demand for more timely, accurate and quality information, both internally and externally to government. The opportunities presented by technology to support these requirements (particularly at the desktop) are also leading to demands for a renewed and more integrated electronic work environment. (1)
"A flexible, integrated work environment which is intuitive to the functions, work processes and information needs of the employee. The environment is comprised of a standard set of work tools at the desktop thereby allowing the worker to create, manage, retrieve and re-use information intuitively and seamlessly at the right time, in the right place, in the right format, and in a cost effective manner. These functions will be performed regardless of media, irrespective of geographical location, and allowing for public access as required."
- EWE Vision
One specific concern within the electronic work environment is that records of government decision making, and transactions that support government activities, are becoming difficult to identify, track and maintain. Records are often created, collected or received without being subject to the procedures or rules that govern when a record should be kept, where it should be kept, by whom, and for how long. Increasingly, users are questioning the status of the email messages they create and transmit - Is an email a record? Where should it be stored? How can it be retrieved? These questions address several broader issues:
"Record keeping and accountability are built into the business processes and electronic work environment thereby ensuring that records are available, understandable and usable."
- Record Keeping Vision
Currently, there is a wide variation across departments in the approach to, and the importance placed on, record keeping activities:
It is in this context that National Archives is attempting to provide leadership in record keeping through the development of the guideline on Managing Electronic Records in an Electronic Work Environment. A component of this leadership is the development of core competencies for the future records specialist, that can be shared with departments.
As part of this preliminary study into the core competencies that would be required of the future records specialist, it was important to gain input from a diverse audience with different perspectives on record keeping. This would provide a broad knowledge base on which to proceed and initiate acceptance of the findings.
The study began with a brief literature review of the vision documents for the electronic work environment, record keeping, and government renewal. This information, combined with interviews with the sponsors at National Archives, provided a framework on which the questions for both the interviews and focus groups were developed. This process also provided insights into the perceived problems of record keeping in an EWE for further examination in subsequent key informant interviews.
Using a structured interview protocol, interviews were conducted with key informants across departments, including users and existing Information Management (IM) and Information Technology (IT) community members. The interviews focused on the diversity of record keeping activities across departments, the current roles and responsibilities of the IT and IM communities in relation to record keeping, the role that the future records specialist would assume and the related competencies required.
Subsequently, a series of focus groups were held with users, existing IM and IT community members and functional experts from corporate services (i.e., legal and financial services). These three disparate communities were chosen in an attempt to gain different perspectives on the challenges of record keeping in an electronic work environment, and the resulting competencies that will be needed by future records specialists. In addition, the focus groups were structured to draw on ideas from individuals in positions of authority in the department as well as those in support roles.
Focus group participants were sent a copy of Record Keeping In the Electronic Work Environment - Vision as well as an example of the vision (see appendix A) in advance of the sessions. The focus group questions addressed participant reactions to the vision documents, their perspectives on record keeping in an electronic work environment, their needs as users and the implications for the skills, knowledge and abilities of the future records specialist.
In this section, the findings from the literature review, interviews and focus groups are presented. The ideas have been grouped into themes. Every attempt has been made to present the comments of participants without interpretation from the researchers. The findings have been divided into the perspectives of "users" (i.e., anyone who creates, receives, stores, disseminates, or disposes of records) and the existing "information management" and "information technology" communities, on their reactions to the record keeping vision that had been provided to them, the role that record keeping currently plays in their departments, their perspectives on the opportunities and constraints of record keeping in an electronic work environment, and their record keeping needs. The section also includes a "high level" listing of the core competencies required by the future record keeping specialist, as envisioned by the participants. The section concludes with participant views on the education and development implications of record keeping within an electronic work environment.
Overall, most users were able to articulate why record keeping is important to their functions. Users from the policy areas, for example, commented that records are important because they provide a historical context or overview of the evolution of a policy. Changes to policies require that analysts can trace this evolution as part of the process of justifying future directions for the policy. Generally, users agreed that record keeping in the electronic work environment is growing in importance as they seek to manage the information they have created or collected, and ensure that they have a well documented trail of what they have done on the job.
As a starting point for the interviews and focus group sessions, participants were asked to comment on their experiences working within an electronic work environment, including how record keeping plays a role in their organization, as well as their own day-to-day activities. Most participants commented that their organizations are in the very early stages of adapting the technology and applying it in the workplace.
Representatives from the more "advanced" departments reported that they have electronic records management initiatives in place. These initiatives range from projects to identify opportunities for re-engineering records management, to projects designed to select software packages to manage electronic records.
Within a department, users are also in various stages of making the transition to working in an electronic work environment. While some users have become very proficient and operate quite comfortably in this new environment, others are having more difficulty making the adjustment. Overall, most users do not have a clear understanding of their responsibilities for record keeping, or the record keeping standards they should employ.
Participants were also asked to comment on the vision document for record keeping in an electronic work environment. While the majority of users agreed with the vision document, they were anxious about the amount of responsibility for record keeping they will have to assume to reach the vision. Given that most users are attempting to "do more with less" in a renewed government environment, they did not see how additional record keeping responsibilities could be built into their existing day-to-day activities. Most users argued that if they were expected to assume more responsibility for record keeping, a number of specific needs would have to be met. The priority needs they outlined are described in the sections below.
Users envision the development of a record keeping system that builds record keeping into the day-to-day business activities, where records of work processes are captured automatically, based on rules built into the design of the processes. The system must be transparent and permit choices in an interactive format, as users carry out their business activities (e.g. decisions regarding classification, storage). Moreover, the success of the record keeping system will depend on the expertise of a records specialist who is able to acquire an understanding of the users' business environment and can ensure that the record keeping system incorporates their specific needs. Some participants suggested that, over time, the records specialist would become sufficiently expert on the business of the organization and its record keeping needs.
In the initial strategic planning stage, users want to be consulted on their record keeping preferences and the options available for meeting these needs. For example, users suggested that several icons could be available to identify the records associated with a particular job function. Users should be able to specify the ones that are of relevance to them to avoid their screens being cluttered with unnecessary icons.
Once the record keeping system has been designed and implemented, users will need coaching on system procedures and capabilities. The specialist will need to be available during the learning phase to act as a resource for the user's questions, and to coach users on more advanced system functionality as they master the basics of identifying records that need to be kept, disposition procedures and schedules, procedures for dealing with the collection, receipt or distribution of records, and how these can be retrieved. These records must be easily retrievable or users will not want to access them.
Users will also need ongoing coaching to ensure that their knowledge of technology and the record keeping system does not lag behind changes to the system created by the introduction of new features. In providing coaching to the user, it is important that the specialist be someone who can translate technical language into layman's terms and translate user needs into system requirements. Also, users commented that to be effective, the specialist must be helpful, non-threatening and approachable.
Users agreed that the extent to which record keeping is valued by the organization depends on the level of management support dedicated to the activity. Participants commented that in the current environment, managers are more likely to review paper documents in final format and are often far removed from the record keeping process. This has had a negative impact on the status of record keeping in the organization as it is not generally recognized as a core function such as finance and personnel administration.
Users suggested that specific management support would take the form of:
Participants expressed concern that unless senior management recognizes the significance of records as an important information resource to help meet the business demands and accountability requirements of the organization, the vision cannot be achieved.
Participants indicated that there is a perceived conflict between the IM and IT communities concerning the roles and responsibilities of each community in the electronic work environment. For example, one member of a focus group expressed the belief that IT people will "absorb" the IM role and that, given a hiring decision between someone with an IM background as opposed to someone with an IT background, the IT person should be hired since people can easily be taught the records management function but few IM people could become as proficient with IT to the appropriate level. Generally, there appears to be serious disagreement over how record keeping should be carried out and by which group, with each biased toward their function assuming the lead role. IM and IT participants agreed that there is a destructive "we-they" mentality in place.
Participants also commented that a key challenge will be to re-educate the existing IM and IT communities to take on a new role. Several participants suggested that few of the exiting records management community members have the types of skills required to be the future records specialist. They suggested that the most serious skill gaps in the this community include: insufficient knowledge of existing technology and its application and future technology trends, lack of well-honed analytical skills, and a lack of knowledge of strategic planning and risk management. Participants agreed that these skills would be central to the role of the future records specialist. Similarly, participants argued that the existing information management community lacks a fundamental understanding of the importance of record keeping to the business processes and accountability needs of an organization.
Overall, the participants agreed with the record keeping vision document. They commented that it presents a realistic high level/global scenario for record keeping in an electronic work environment. However, participants also commented that a more detailed description of "sub-visions" or incremental steps are required to help departments make the transition toward the vision. In addition, participants commented that while the visions may be clear to the existing archives and records management community, it may not be to other communities that will play a key role in reaching the vision (e.g. IT community).
There was significant discussion during the interviews and focus groups about what "type" of individual would be required to fill the role of future records specialist. The discussions started with participants brainstorming a very preliminary list of the potential roles and responsibilities required to perform the job function. After reviewing their preliminary list, most participants agreed that due to the diverse nature of the role that the specialist must play, more than one "level" or stream of specialist would be required to fill this role. Most participants agreed that the list of potential roles and responsibilities of the records specialist could be categorized into 2 specific levels.
In their view, participants suggested that the level 1 specialist would assume the role of a visionary; a person who sees the "big picture" in the organization, how the business process of organization operates. This individual would also understand the accountability needs of the organization and how these must be built into the business and record keeping processes. The level 1 specialist would work at a strategic or management level.
The level 2, or line specialist would work at an operations level in the organization, assuming the role of liaison between the level 1 specialist and the users and offering support to both groups in matters involving record keeping.
The specific roles and responsibilities that participants identified for each level include:
Level 1 Specialist:
Role |
Description |
Visionary |
Has an overview of the business of the organization and its work flow and business processes, and how different working groups within the organization interact; Understands what types of information needs to be captured in the organization, given its business and accountability structure and processes. |
Policy Driver |
Develops the rules of record keeping (i.e. policies for what needs to be captured based on the business needs of the organization, procedures, standards, practices for identification, description, classification, organization, storage, protection, retention and disposition). Liaises with senior management to ensure that record keeping rules are reflected in the plans, tools and techniques used to develop, implement, evaluate and audit the organization's programs and services |
Systems Designer |
Ensures that record keeping requirements are built into the design of business applications, work processes and management functions by working with the level 2 specialists and other communities involved in their design. |
Advisor/ |
Provides advice on the development and modification of record keeping requirements to ensure that business and accountability requirements can be met on an ongoing basis. Keeps up-to-date with developments in the field of record keeping and share what is relevant with colleagues. Communicates with other Level 1 records specialists in other departments, at the branch or group level, and/or public sector organizations to share lessons learned and ideas for improvements. |
The corresponding core competencies were summarized as follows:
Key Skills, Knowledge and Abilities |
|
Level 2 Specialist:
Role |
Description |
Retrieval Expert |
Provides access to information stored in central reserves, and navigates through the volumes of information sources available to locate specific information for users. |
Educator/ |
Provides advice and guidance to users on their record keeping responsibilities and how to meet these responsibilities. Monitors the record keeping activities of users. Liaises with Level 1 specialist to ensure that the changing needs of users continue to be met through the design and implementation of the record keeping system. Raises the awareness of managers and other users about the importance of record keeping to the business activities and accountability of government. |
| Key Skills, Knowledge and Abilities |
|
Participants commented that while they envision two specific levels of expertise, they do see some overlap in the roles and responsibilities of the two levels of records specialist. Participants also argued that during the transitional phase toward the record keeping vision, users will rely most heavily on the level 2 specialist for guidance and support, given that this is the individual that users will have the most direct contact with.
In the discussions that followed the identification of the core competencies for the future records specialist, participants were asked to assess what other factors would have an impact on the evolution of the vision with respect to the records specialist. During this discussion, some topics invoked intense debate among the participants. While time constraints resulted in a consensus not being reached, a number of hypotheses emerged.
The most significant included:
Lastly, participants were asked to comment on their own training requirements to make the transition to the vision. A few participants commented that they will need very little development as they have a sound understanding of technology and their record keeping responsibilities within a electronic work environment. On the other hand, some participants feel very uncomfortable with their levels of competence in the use of hardware and software and are unsure of the existence of record keeping standards and procedures, let alone how to comply with them.
Most participants fall between these two poles of understanding. As more of the responsibility for record keeping is transferred to users, it will become increasingly important that they acquire "basic skills" through training. A "basic" level of confidence would include, as a minimum, training in the following areas:
Participants noted that they, and many of their colleagues are attempting to acquire computer and record keeping skills on-the-job, but time constraints, and the lack of adequate training/coaching, make this a lengthy, difficult process. Participants suggested that formal training on user responsibilities for record keeping could be offered through organizations such as Training and Development Canada, CCMD, and the Institute. Similarly, by providing formal courses in record keeping, professional organizations such as ARMA or RMI could educate users, while at the same time raise awareness of the importance of record keeping. Additionally, record keeping should be integrated into existing and emerging courses for helping people manage and deliver programs and services.
Participants from the IT and IM communities suggested that universities could offer continuing education courses in electronic record keeping to assist members of these two communities in upgrading their expertise in this area. In addition, these participants suggested that government training organizations such as the Institute and Training and Development Canada could expand their curriculum to include courses in record keeping in an electronic work environment.
The next section of the report presents a preliminary job model for the record keeping specialist in an electronic work environment.
This section of the report presents a preliminary record keeping job model for an electronic work environment, which is based on the results of the interviews and focus groups within the context of the record keeping vision and the example of the vision as described in Appendix A. Section 4.1 details the model itself, including the key job functions and corresponding skills, knowledge and abilities. In addition, a high level list of the main tasks for each job function is presented. Section 4.2 summarizes the education and development implications given the preliminary job model. This section also incorporates the comments and suggestions made during the interviews and focus groups.
The job model presents the preliminary list of the core competencies (skills, knowledge and abilities) given a set of key job functions. The job model aggregates the list of roles and responsibilities developed by the focus group participants into four key job functions: Systems Designer, Policy Driver, Retrieval Expert, and Advisor/Coach.
Figure 1 on page 14 presents an overview of the record keeping job model. Figures 2 through 5 provide a detailed description of the main tasks associated with each job function.
One of the discussion points in the interviews and focus groups was the extent to which existing IT and IM community members have the necessary core competencies to take on the role of records specialist in an electronic work environment. Most participants agreed that neither community currently has all of the required skills, knowledge and abilities.
In a recent survey conducted by Duxbury, Higgins and Associates (1996) for the Treasury Board Secretariat, over 10,000 Canadian federal government public servants responded to questions that were designed to help TBS define the information technology and information management communities and their education/training requirements. Based on an analysis of responses to a question asking each survey participant to self identify themselves as IM, IT or both, it was concluded that a new combined IM/IT community was emerging. Employees in this community are more likely than employees in each of the IM and IT communities to perform all of the tasks identified with the traditional IT (computer operations; database administration and support; designing, developing and maintaining software; end-user desktop support; and IT client interface) and IM (collection, acquisition and appraisal of information; information retrieval; and the use, research and reference of information) roles. It is interesting to note that employees in the IT/IM group indicated that they spend a large amount of time completing IT related tasks.
Systems Designer
Policy Driver
Retrieval Expert
Advisor/Coach
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Record Keeping Specialists:
Job Function:
Systems Designer
Main Tasks:
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Systems Designers:
Job Function:
Policy Driver
Main Tasks:
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Policy Drivers:
Job Function:
Retrieval Expert
Main Tasks:
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Retrieval Experts:
Job Function:
Advisor/Coach
Main Tasks:
Skills, Knowledge and Abilities for Advisor/Coaches:
Overall, the Duxbury study indicates that the IT/IM group are the most diverse with respect to the types of tasks they do. Duxbury suggests that the IT/IM role is poorly understood in many departments and employees within this group are expected to be "jack-of-all-trades". However, for the purposes of the record keeping job model outlined above, the IT/IM group most closely reflects the combination of skills, knowledge and abilities that will be required to carry out the corresponding record keeping job functions.
Given this scenario in addition to the examination that was made of other education/training initiatives underway, there are a number of steps which can be taken by training organizations across the federal government as well as in other public and private sector organizations, to develop the set of core competencies required to meet the vision of record keeping in an electronic work environment. Table 1 presents a summary of organizations and the steps that can be taken to promote electronic record keeping expertise in the federal government.
Organization |
Suggested Activity |
The Institute |
Expand curricula to include IM modules that incorporate courses in electronic record keeping to target existing IT and IM community members. |
CCMD |
Include an electronic record keeping component in all management level courses. |
TDC |
Expand curricula to include courses in electronic record keeping |
Alliance of Libraries, Archives and Records Management (ALARM) |
Encourage associations to develop training in electronic record keeping (within an IM context) under the life-long learning action plan for ALARM |
Universities |
Develop continuing education in the area of electronic record keeping that will permit individuals to develop the necessary expertise in this area. Include electronic record keeping courses or modules in specific disciplines such as: Computer Science, Management Science, Law, and Public Administration. |
Table 1: Education and Development Action Plan
Based on the results of the interviews, focus groups and review of the literature, it is recommended that steps be taken to:
Record Keeping Vision and Example
(package distributed to focus group participants)
Information Management Standards and Practices Division
National Archives of Canada
May 1996
Prerequisites of the Users
Prerequisites of the Organization
Management Requirements
People Requirements
Record Keeping Requirements
Technology Requirements
Record keeping and accountability are built into the business processes and electronic work environment thereby ensuring that records are available, understandable and usable.
Information is often created, collected or received in today's office systems environment without being subject to the procedures or rules that govern such factors as when a record should be kept, where it should be kept, by whom, and for how long. For instance, email messages and other electronic documents are often transmitted without the benefit of built-in rules for routing and filing. Concerns have been raised that records of government decision making and transactions that support government activities, especially those in electronic form, are difficult identify, track and maintain.
For the purpose of this document, record keeping is defined as the act of capturing and maintaining records in an available, understandable and usable form to meet business and accountability requirements throughout their life cycle. This document presents a vision of record keeping in the electronic work environment, and how it can be applied consistently within institutions and across government.
The record keeping vision is based on strategic drivers that are placing demands on organizations to change the way in which they carry out their responsibilities for record keeping. These strategic drivers are as follows.
The achievement of the vision will lead to the following outcomes.
In order for the outcomes to be achieved, the following prerequisites must be accomplished.
To achieve the vision of record keeping, the following management, people, record keeping, and technology requirements must be met.
The following management requirements are needed for effective record keeping across the organization.
People are the key to successful record keeping, and organizations need to ensure that people have the appropriate knowledge and skills required to support the business and accountability needs of the organization. People requirements include the following.
The following record keeping requirements must be met across the organization.
As business applications, work processes and management functions are automated, record keeping requirements should be built into their design. Based on a technology infrastructure of networks, servers, communications facilities and workstations, the technology requirements for record keeping include the following.
The following example is an extract from:
John McDonald, 'Managing Records in the Modern Office: Taming the Wild Frontier', Archivaria 39, (Spring, 1995), pp 7-79
"What will this future look like? Right now my screen is full of icons that represent the "toolbox" of utilities (e.g. word processing, spreadsheet, email, database, etc.) That I need to do my work. In the future, and as a program manager, I want a screen that contains icons that reflect my business. In my own environment at the National Archives, I would like the icons to be based on the Operational Plan Framework (or OPF) of my department, the National Archives.
Every Canadian government department is required to have an OPF that describes its functions and activities. It is extremely important because it is used as the basis for the management of resources, reporting to parliament and performance measurement. An OPF is much more stable than an organization chart because it is based on functions and activities that tend to remain constant over time. For instance, the OPF of the National Archives has been in place since 1990 and has survived and indeed facilitated the reorganizations that we have experienced over those years.
All of the activities and sub-activities of the National Archives are related to its four functions: Services, Awareness and Assistance; Management of Government Information; Holdings Management, and; Administration. My own Division, which advises government departments on the application of standards and practices to the management of records, is responsible for nine activities that support three of these functions. All of the division's resources, its initiatives, everything that it does and for which I am accountable, are managed and reported on in accordance with the following activities: "development" of standards and practices, "advice", "professional development", "evaluation", "program support-Canadian", "program support-international", "related operational" activities, "planning" activities and "administration". These are the icons that I want on my screen.
An example might help to illustrate what I mean and how this is relevant directly to record keeping. When I click on 'development', for instance, I want to be provided with options that permit me to establish a project (e.g. on a guide on essential records), monitor a project, write a memo on the project, or organize a meeting about the project. But rather than have to develop a project proposal, or a project control sheet or even a memo from scratch, I would like to see the project proposal form already set up (through the development of style sheets and macros based on the use of the word processing or project management software) in a way that reflects the format and rules that my division has decided upon for developing project proposals. When I click on the routing list for my proposal, rather than having to select from all of the names of the staff in the National Archives, I want to see the names of those people who normally receive 'development' project proposals. I also want to know, as the proposal is sent, that the record keeping rules that were designed into the applications for documenting and otherwise supporting the tasks associated with the management of development projects are respected. Above all, just as I recognize my accountability for finance and personnel, I would like to think that I was able to carry my responsibility for applying the record keeping rules of the organization in a manner that supported, directly, the accountability and business requirements of my program. Naturally, I would also like to think that I could count on a facilitator (the records manager?) to help me meet my responsibilities.
Similarly, if I need to send a draft of the annual report to the ICA Electronic Records Committee to the committee members, I would click on "Program Support - International" and be presented with a suite of pre-designed and inter-connected utilities that would permit me to develop a covering letter, attach the report and send the package to the members (via the mail or internet) and to the people to whom I automatically carbon copy all Committee business. Again, all of the record keeping (tagging, storing, etc.) would happen automatically based on rules and criteria that were developed by the "records manager", in consultation with myself and my managers within the context of the organization's need to avoid corporate amnesia. There would be no "filing" icon. The rules for defining and establishing how the content, context, and structure of the records of the actions and transactions of my division's business activities are to be kept would have been set beforehand and designed into the applications - that is, behind the screen..
If I or any of my staff wanted to retrieve records then they could click on the "information locator" icon which would serve as a corporate 'gopher' (again pre-designed) that would search for records, information, and data regardless of where they were located. The mechanics involved in enabling this to happen would be designed into the navigation utilities located behind the screen. The need for a central repository of electronic and even hard copy records would diminish with the increase in the sophistication of the tools that I would employ to access and retrieve not only records but any information that we needed to support our work. I would not care if I was dipping into the records office or the library. All I want to know is that I received or gained access to all the information that I wanted and that it appeared before me in a way that was available, understandable and usable. Again I would like to think that I could count on a facilitator (the librarian?) to help me respond to my own access and retrieval needs, preferably by working with technical people and the records manager (i.e. the person who understands context) to develop and integrate the appropriate tools and place them behind the screen."
1. National Archives, Electronic Work Environment (EWE) - Vision Prepared for the EWE Management Board, 1995.
2. National Archives, Record Keeping in the Electronic Work Environment - Vision. 1995.